|
If
a single word could express how 2001 is shaping up for the
Bonneville Power Administration, that word is extreme.
A
combination of extremely low streamflows in the Columbia Basin,
extremely high wholesale electricity prices and an extremely tight
West Coast power supply presents an unprecedented challenge to the
agency's ability to meet its public responsibilities.
The
purpose of this letter is to alert you to the fact that, should
present trends continue, this combination of pressures on BPA's
and the region's natural and financial resources will force
decisions on hydro system operations that were unthinkable a year
ago.
We
can now say with certainty that the region is confronted with
difficult, even agonizing, choices. For the remainder of this
year, we must deal with tradeoffs involving power system
reliability, BPA's financial health that supports numerous
regional objectives, fish enhancementmeasures and reservoir elevations. The following
information summarizes the reality and context of the situation we
face and the potential consequences for future decisions.
Extreme conditions
The
following three factors are contributing to this year's
extraordinary circumstances. Each factor alone could pose challenges
for BPA, but the combination is particularly difficult.
A
near record low-water year
At
the end of February, the National Weather Service River Forecast
Center revised downward its forecast of the volume of Columbia Basin
water runoff for 2001 to only 55 percent of normal, the
second-lowest runoff in the 72-year record of this measurement.
A
tight West Coast power supply
No
doubt you have heard about the difficult power supply situation in
California where power emergencies have become an almost dailyoccurrence, even to the extent of rolling
blackouts in some areas.
For
decades BPA has imported power from California during winter months
when Northwest electricity demand tends to be highest. But this
year, far from being able to help the Northwest, California is
seeking additional power from us to help it cope with its frequent
power emergencies. Other sources of power, such as Canada, also have
much less to export than in past years. This lack of available
supply, along with the drought, has led BPA to declare power system
emergencies on two occasions this winter.
An extreme
market
The
tight West Coast energy supply in a deregulated market has driven
wholesale power prices higher than anyone thought possible. We
expect little change in the short term.
To
put prices in perspective, note that historic Northwest wholesale
electricity prices have rarely been above $30 a megawatt-hour. But
now we are seeing prices in the range of $200 to $300 a
megawatt-hour. At one point in January, wholesale power prices
climbed to more than $1,000 a megawatt-hour. Faced with cold
temperatures and high electricity demand, BPA spent $50 million on
power purchases in just four days this winter. These kinds of prices
signal that there may not be enough power available at any price to
keep the lights on during certain periods.
Operation
of the hydro system so far this year
Streamflows are the lifeblood
of the region's hydro system. They are important to the survival of
endangered salmon and steelhead that migrate to the sea during the
spring and summer months. They also produce hydropower generation
and revenues from the sale of power. The Federal Columbia River
Power System (FCRPS) operations for fish are guided by Biological
Opinions* that call for augmented flows and spill to help juvenile
salmon and steelhead migrate to the sea. (*There are two Biological
Opinions. The opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries
Service addresses ocean-going fish such as salmon and
steelhead. The opinion issued by the U.S. Department of Fish
and Wildlife addresses resident fish such as sturgeon and bull
trout.)
At times there may not be enough water to meet the normal operation
for optimal fish support and still have enough power generationat the right times. When this occurs, BPA is
expected to purchase power in the wholesale market to supplement the
regional supply. But the Biological Opinions anticipated that there
could be circumstances when the power grid would require
extraordinary support. This year may turn out to have an extended
period of such circumstances.
Earlier
in the year, BPA declared power emergencies when we were unable to
purchase enough power to meet demand. We kept the lights on by using
power we normally would have stored for the spring fish migration.
The federal agencies chose to keep endangered chum redds below
Bonneville Dam wet throughout the winter. Although the purpose of
the decision was fish protection, it did serve to increase power
generation and help preserve system reliability during the winter.
However, it also reduced the amount of water stored in Grand Coulee
and other reservoirs.
We
share the concern of many throughout the region about the potential
impacts that drought conditions could have on endangered fish. So
far, we expect that the brief system emergencies we declared will
have less than a 2 percent impact on spring flows for fish. Make no
mistake, we take even a 2 percent effect very seriously. On the other
hand, we believe there could be dire consequences for the people of
the Northwest if we fail to use the flexibility of the hydro system
and the provisions in the Biological Opinion when power system
reliability is
threatened.
The
biggest issues, however, are still in front of us.
Future
operations of the hydro system
Our
analysis now shows that we cannot meet the standard operations
called for in the Biological Opinion, maintain reliability, refill
reservoirs and stay in the black financially under the latest runoff
forecast. Unless the water situation turns around dramatically
within the next few weeks, the region as a whole will be forced to
make hard choices. Given the power purchases and load buy-downs we
have been able to make for the rest of the year, we will have just
enough energy to meet our own loads only if we dramatically reduce planned spill operations.
Given the lack of additional power supplies in the market, we are
concerned about potential circumstances (e.g. loss of a major
generating facility) where we would have inadequate power supplies.
In addition, if we were to
operate to meet the normal Biological Opinion requirements, the most
likely scenario is that we would not have sufficient cash to pay all
of our bills during several of the summer and fall months.

Unfortunately,
we wouldn't miss by just a little, but more likely by a mile, even
assuming all the extraordinary measures that have already been put
in place (see Appendix below).
Such an outcome would require
dramatic involvement by extra-regional interests in BPA's financial
affairs, and, frankly, the repercussions of such involvement are
impossible to predict.
If we are to avoid reliability or financial calamities, it is
increasingly likely that BPA will need to declare extended power
system emergencies this spring and summer. Given the extreme
conditions, the affected federal agencies in the region, including
BPA, have drafted a set of proposed principles that describe the
circumstances for emergency FCRPS power operations through 2001 as
well as actions that must be taken prior to declaring an emergency.
These principles describe criteria for the two issues that we
believe define the need for declaring a power system emergency:
maintaining reliability and maintaining BPA's financial liquidity.
Keeping the lights on is obviously important. Maintaining
BPA's ability to pay its bills also is important for two key
reasons. If we are to preserve reliability, we must be able to
pay for any power purchases we need to make. We also need to
ensure that BPA can continue to be an economic engine for salmon
recovery in the region. Currently, BPA's cost for fish and
wildlife mitigation run into the hundreds of millions of dollars
each year, and we are committed to increase our funding in the
coming years.
The principles also describe priorities for hydro system operation
measures that are designed to aid fish and that were included in the
Biological Opinion. The priorities will help guide hydro
system operations, allowing modifications based on actual
streamflow conditions.
The
principles were needed because the Biological Opinions did not
define what constitutes a power system emergency. In addition, the
principles are an attempt to define a strategy for operating the
hydro system in extreme conditions such as those we are now
experiencing. Because the principles establish priorities for hydro
operations, they allow the region to engage in the discussions about
operations without having to engage in day-to-day management
decisions. These principles are designed to be flexible, recognizing
that no one can predict today the actual streamflow levels of
tomorrow. The goal is to avoid making all decisions reactively in
real time.
The
agencies have shared the draft principles with the region and are
considering regional input in developing a plan for 2001 operations. We plan to
finalize the criteria for declaring power emergencies in the very
near future. For more information on the principles, go to http:/www.salmonrecovery.gov/2001principles3_2.pdf
or write to the Bonneville Power Administration, Public Information
Center, PO. Box 3621,
Portland,
OR 97208,
or
call 1-800-622-4520.
How
will fish be protected?
BPA
remains committed to implementing the Biological Opinions. These
opinions are long-term plans and, as we all hope, this particular
year is an aberration. It's clear it will be difficult to achieve the opinions' recommendations in this
extraordinary year. Much of the damage is drought-related, and
would have resulted with or without power system emergencies. But we
are seeking ideas on how we might offset any harm to fish that
results from power system emergency operations.
We
intend to move forward to implement the plans called for in the
Biological Opinions in those areas that are not affected by this
year's conditions.
Conclusion
I have been greatly impressed and appreciative of the many comments
we have received that reflect an understanding that this is
a difficult year in which difficult choices must be made. It
is my hope that we can work together as a region to preserve
reliability, maintain BPA's fiscal stability, minimize impacts on
reservoir operations and achieve the long-term goals in the
Biological Opinions for fish enhancement. I'm asking for your help
to achieve these objectives.
Sincerely,
Stephen
J. Wright
Acting
Administrator
Appendix
Trying
to cushion the blow
Working
with the Northwest states and federal agencies, BPA has taken a
number of actions, both short-term and long-term, to mitigate the
combined effects for near-record low water, record high prices and
the tight West Cost power supply. Here's what we have done, so
far:
Short-term
actions
Short-term, our goal has
been to conserve water for fish and reduce demand on the BPA
system. To accomplish this we have:
- Contracted
for a total reduction of over 2,300 megawatts in market
purchases and industrial load reductions since Dec. 1, 2000 at a
cost of roughly $500 million.
- Assisted
the Northwest governors in their public call for a
1,000-megawatt reduction in Northwest energy consumption.
BPA has aggressively supported the Northwest governors' calls
for conservation and sponsored advertisements in 17 regional
newspapers.
- Pursued,
as a last resort, more aggressive operations of the federal
hydro system by calling a power emergency in accordance with the
Biological Opinion Technical Management Team protocols.
Long-term
actions
BPA is working with
other regional interests to promote investments in
infrastructure that will provide new generation (including
renewables), increase the reliability of the transmission
system, promote increased demand-side management and
conservation and support the gas pipeline and storage capacity
needed to supply new generation. Our long-term actions
include:
- Offering
conservation and renewable discounts to utility customers
(including starting the program eight months ahead of
schedule) and initiating a Demand Exchange Program.
The latter program pays customers to voluntarily go off
line for brief periods when the power is needed. The
Demand Exchange has 463 megawatts of load signed up.
- Considering
a proposal from customers that, if adopted, would adjust
rates regularly to reflect BPA's actual cost of serving
customers' loads. Our task now is to achieve a
regional agreement on how we are going to reduce the
amount of power we have to buy as well as the price we
have to pay. That will help us get the rate increase
down to a level that will minimize the negative impact on
the Northwest economy while protecting the environment.
If BPA were unable to
cover its costs in its rates, we would most likely have to get
financial support form the U.S. Treasury. However, it
has always been our view that it is in the best interest of
the region to be clear that Northwest ratepayers support the
region's hydropower system and that it does not lean on U.S.
taxpayers. |
March 2001
Link
to Rates Index
|