January 1998

Minutes

News & Views from Your Elected Representatives

Several months ago we reviewed, in the monthly board report, the work functions and ongoing service provided by our skilled line crews and field staff.

This month I would like to review the technical and support functions of our engineering department.

This work unit, as expected, is smaller in number than the field/line unit. Working under the overall supervision of the Engineering and Operations Manager, there are two electrical engineers, one Engineering Technician, and one Engineering Assistant (for clerical and record keeping). Also, within the unit is the Operations & Purchasing Coordinator for all supplies, e.g. lines, transformers, etc., a building/site custodian, and a utility staff responsible for vehicles and grounds maintenance at both our central office and our four substations.

The overall responsibilities fall within four basic categories:

  1. Response to customer requests including both residential and general service.
  2. Design and ongoing operation of our electrical system throughout our 17.48 sq. mi. service area.
  3. Ensuring cost-effective operations within budgetary limitations.
  4. Participation in community, regional and national professional/trade organizations relating to the electrical industry.

Customer service is a high priority for this work unit within Salem Electric. It is usually this technical staff that is called upon initially to promptly deal with customer calls regarding technical issues, whether it be a residential customer with concerns about power surges and their home computers or Mitsubishi Silicon of America (our largest industrial customer) requesting consultation on a major addition/modification to their operations.

Once the question/problem has been identified/diagnosed clearly by the engineering department, perhaps the answer can be provided over the phone, but often requires one of our service crews, along with engineering, to go out on site to further verify a problem, if any, and provide the necessary corrective action.

Ongoing planning, design and adjustment to our present and future electrical operations is this unit's responsibility. Working on ways to enhance and improve our service delivery system is a high priority. This includes working with the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) as we administer our power sales contract with them. New construction requires close coordination with other utilities, primarily, but not limited to TCI  (local cable television) and the telephone company. Our computerized SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) helps to provide control of our entire electrical delivery system.

Technical obsolescence of our present SCADA equipment requires replacement in 1998. The ever advancing technology in our industry is an ongoing foot race for our engineering staff to keep pace with technological changes, thus assuring our customers with the most cost effective delivery of power.

This department works closely with governmental agencies, e.g. EPA, Oregon DEQ, PUC, OSHA, to insure safety and service reliability, as well as compliance with and awareness of environmental issues.

Like our line/field crews, the engineering staff is on call 24 hours per day 365 days per year. In anticipated emergency weather forecasts, the entire crew is on call and focused upon close coordination with our field staff who are out tackling specific power outages as they occur.

In looking at Salem Electric as an electric utility cooperative, we must recognize a close working relationship between all facets of our organization...our general manager's office, the engineering/operations staff, our member services unit, and finally our administrative support unit encompassing our accounting and customer service office staff.

Engineering is a vital cog in that wheel, working together to provide the most cost-effective, reliable electric service to our customers.

-- Curt Culver, Director

TOP


Minutes of the Meeting Held on:

November 25, 1997

The Salem Electric Board of Directors met at 7:00 p.m. November 25, 1997.  All board members were present. 

This month's meeting of the board nearly broke the record for the shortest meeting. Despite the brevity however, two important resolutions were considered and passed. Both items had been deliberated in the past and were now being considered for formal action.

The Budget  

Bob Speckman presented the proposed budget for 1998. This had been discussed at the last meeting. There were no questions by the board members. Motion was made by Bonesteele, seconded by Towslee and carried unanimously to accept the budget as presented.

Green Power Contract

Speckman reviewed the board's resolution to contract with BPA to purchase approximately 15% of our load from a wind power project in Wyoming. This contract will extend through the year 2001. The board discussed this project at last month's meeting and had passed a motion to continue with its green power commitment.

Murray McCreary, Facilities Engineering Manager at Mitsubishi Silicon America, requested that he address the board.  After last month's meeting, McCreary had spoken with MSA's new chief financial officer and was assured that MSA continues to be committed to environmental excellence and is in support of green power. In addition, he said MSA would be pursuing similar options at their other plants.  Dyer thanked McCreary for his comments and said MSA was setting an example for other big businesses.

Motion was made by Culver, seconded by Anderson and carried unanimously to approve the resolution as presented.

Meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m.

-- Bill Wolf, Secretary/Treasurer

TOP

 | Board Reports |